<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 5 Reasons I Appreciated Seminary</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thedesocios.com/faith/2009/10/5-reasons-i-appreciated-seminary/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thedesocios.com/faith/2009/10/5-reasons-i-appreciated-seminary/</link>
	<description>Faith, Life and Family</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2011 17:25:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: krm</title>
		<link>http://www.thedesocios.com/faith/2009/10/5-reasons-i-appreciated-seminary/comment-page-1/#comment-382</link>
		<dc:creator>krm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 19:01:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedesocios.com/?p=1249#comment-382</guid>
		<description>I find this truly refreshing to hear! Thanks for taking the time to more fully explain it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find this truly refreshing to hear! Thanks for taking the time to more fully explain it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam</title>
		<link>http://www.thedesocios.com/faith/2009/10/5-reasons-i-appreciated-seminary/comment-page-1/#comment-381</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 17:39:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedesocios.com/?p=1249#comment-381</guid>
		<description>When I said this I was refering to questions in and out of class. I remember alot of discussion with people where we challenged alot of the basic assumptions of our traditions. 

It could be that the questions I wrestled with were not as hard as some others, but especially when it came to textual criticism in the NT with Selvaggio we really wrestled through some stuff.
From a academic perspective, there were people from some pretty variant traditions, and in most circumstances I don&#039;t think the profs ever forced certain assumptions on people. I think the challenge is that some of the guys were at the same time candidates for ministry in conservative presbyterian denominations like the PCA OPC and RPCNA. So I think it put professors in the position of being denominational spokesmen. 

I&#039;m guessing that in the grand scheme I could imagine that rpts would be less open to asking hard questions. 

I just hate that alot of these no seminary guys really haven&#039;t wrestled with the Bible, they assume we can name every author and equally explain every text, and thats just not the truth, even at a conservative seminary.

I think there are some profs that are better at this than others.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I said this I was refering to questions in and out of class. I remember alot of discussion with people where we challenged alot of the basic assumptions of our traditions. </p>
<p>It could be that the questions I wrestled with were not as hard as some others, but especially when it came to textual criticism in the NT with Selvaggio we really wrestled through some stuff.<br />
From a academic perspective, there were people from some pretty variant traditions, and in most circumstances I don&#8217;t think the profs ever forced certain assumptions on people. I think the challenge is that some of the guys were at the same time candidates for ministry in conservative presbyterian denominations like the PCA OPC and RPCNA. So I think it put professors in the position of being denominational spokesmen. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m guessing that in the grand scheme I could imagine that rpts would be less open to asking hard questions. </p>
<p>I just hate that alot of these no seminary guys really haven&#8217;t wrestled with the Bible, they assume we can name every author and equally explain every text, and thats just not the truth, even at a conservative seminary.</p>
<p>I think there are some profs that are better at this than others.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: krm</title>
		<link>http://www.thedesocios.com/faith/2009/10/5-reasons-i-appreciated-seminary/comment-page-1/#comment-380</link>
		<dc:creator>krm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 17:02:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedesocios.com/?p=1249#comment-380</guid>
		<description>I have not attended, but have not necessarily gotten the impression from others that RPTS is a &quot;safe place to ask hard questions.&quot; This is in no way meant to be argumentative, it is a very sincere question.
I would find this to be refreshing. What are/aren&#039;t hard questions and how have you seen them encountered @ RPTS (my denomination&#039;s seminary for those interested)? Would there be questions that are &quot;out of bounds&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have not attended, but have not necessarily gotten the impression from others that RPTS is a &#8220;safe place to ask hard questions.&#8221; This is in no way meant to be argumentative, it is a very sincere question.<br />
I would find this to be refreshing. What are/aren&#8217;t hard questions and how have you seen them encountered @ RPTS (my denomination&#8217;s seminary for those interested)? Would there be questions that are &#8220;out of bounds&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

